Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- New Model is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Released January 2012
- Earlier Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P1 was revealed 3 years prior to the SP-620 UZ and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-P1 matches up against the SP-620 UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-P1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-P1
SP-620 UZ | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 29 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-P1 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P1 features exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-P1 versus the SP-620 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P1 and SP-620 UZ is 86 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P1 and SP-620 UZ.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P1 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will give more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-P1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 435g (0.96 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $182 | $199 |