Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Replacement is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P1 was released 4 years prior to the TG-2 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-P1 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-P1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P1
TG-2 iHS | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
Screen resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-P1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P1 provides external dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P1 versus Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P1 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9614d/9614ddd7bddbbea7ff7abf00337916e1f7b02e83" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P1 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15b74/15b749d0f26101a174cedc2d17908818df6a7742" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P1 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical MP albeit different sensor sizes. The E-P1 contains the bigger sensor which will make getting bokeh less difficult. The more aged E-P1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4229d/4229dd6fbf67929af6e8d6b9399f4f349252dbce" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae920/ae920362124232ac19b508bc5fcf1c11c62764d3" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-29 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 610k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $182 | $380 |