Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f2b/f7f2b938fbb5b27534c61aae91a2ae9f4e196796" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released July 2009
- Updated by Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P1 (12MP) and the FH22 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and FH22 (1/2.3") boast different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-P1 was launched 5 months prior to the FH22 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-P1 scores vs the FH22 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery and Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Panasonic FH22
E-P1 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Olympus E-P1
FH22 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Panasonic FH22
E-P1 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P1 offers outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has measurements of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-P1 against the FH22.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/131c3/131c30dd4dd99010821faec806a830940124cd1e" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P1 and FH22 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c770e/c770e4ef57ec250c1d48cd6973a36621a620b2e0" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P1 and FH22.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FH22 will show extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca86c/ca86c4f1755fdffd1325339ff0e8d1b2faa56aed" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87e51/87e51bb9af2578fe5a082628844532088d6d5027" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-29 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 170 grams (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $182 | $200 |