Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbf7/dcbf73e908bd36e87108a2c1fd0be2582f915b4f" alt="Olympus PEN E-P1 front Olympus PEN E-P1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300M front Samsung NX300M front"
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Renewed by Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-P1 was announced 4 years earlier than the NX300M which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-P1 grades against the NX300M in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Samsung NX300M
E-P1 | NX300M |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-P1
NX300M | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 768k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+538k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Samsung NX300M
E-P1 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P1 has got exterior measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P1 and the NX300M.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb113/fb11363389aba9fb14ffa932a2dfa055e3b63864" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and NX300M is 86 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e696/3e696f9374293dc0bd5a63d81324d0c6d0836999" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P1 and NX300M.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX300M will give you greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b319/4b319009fb348c2aea6263dda0b3795a958adac3" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25d14/25d145c70deecfe107ccc57f066aab8beabdf927" alt="Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P1 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P1 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Samsung NX300M |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 768k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 pounds) | 331g (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 330 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $182 | $699 |