Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11515/1151579478081071cc2b1eedc776984b8b96fb07" alt="Sony Alpha a6400 front Sony Alpha a6400 front"
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expand to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Revealed January 2019
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony A6400, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The TG-4 was announced 4 years before the A6400 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TG-4 grades versus the A6400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Sony Alpha a6400. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Sony A6400
TG-4 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Olympus TG-4
A6400 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2019 | ![]() | April 2015 | Fresher by 45 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+462k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Sony A6400
TG-4 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 comes with physical measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") having a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-4 versus Sony A6400 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-4 against the A6400.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a293c/a293c8889d4605644c4d4cc33fc87805b8b6e837" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and A6400 is 90 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5601a/5601a6fc10142ab73c9141d233cbb62fd92b095f" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-4 and A6400.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The TG-4 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony A6400 will offer you extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older TG-4 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a75c/4a75cdb0f44a07e8ef0032b8058cf83ccabcde88" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e728c/e728c5bbf00be6284a426c354632889e520fce30" alt="Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-4 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2019-01-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 32000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 25 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 403g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photos | 410 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-92B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $379 | $898 |