Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-P1 was released 6 years before the QX1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-P1 matches up vs the QX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Sony QX1
| E-P1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-P1
| QX1 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 62 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Sony QX1
| E-P1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 features outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-P1 compared to the QX1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and QX1 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P1 and QX1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony QX1 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 440 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $182 | $500 |