Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
90 Imaging
62 Features
48 Overall
56
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Successor is Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P1 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-P1 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P1 was released 6 years before the QX1 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-P1 matches up vs the QX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P1 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P1 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Sony QX1
| E-P1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | " | Bigger screen (+3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-P1
| QX1 | E-P1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 62 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-P1 and Sony QX1
| E-P1 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P1 features outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-P1 compared to the QX1.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P1 and QX1 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P1 and QX1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P1 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony QX1 will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P1 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-P1 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P1 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P1 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2014-09-03 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | - |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | 440 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $182 | $500 |