Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Announced April 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P2 was revealed 4 years earlier than the TG-850 iHS and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-P2 grades against the TG-850 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-P2 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-P2
TG-850 iHS | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | April 2010 | More recent by 45 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-P2 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P2 offers outer dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-P2 and the TG-850 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and TG-850 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P2 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will provide greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-P2 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-04-22 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $799 | $250 |