Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Launched May 2019
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-5
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-6, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-6 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-P2 was unveiled 10 years earlier than the TG-6 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-6 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-P2 matches up vs the TG-6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 and Olympus Tough TG-6. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery and Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-6
E-P2 | TG-6 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-6 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2019 | April 2010 | Newer by 110 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-6
E-P2 | TG-6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Olympus TG-6 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P2 versus Olympus TG-6 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-P2 versus the TG-6.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and TG-6 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and TG-6.
As you have seen, both cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-P2 provides the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-P2 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-04-22 | 2019-05-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) | 253 grams (0.56 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $799 | $449 |