Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Successor is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Introduced July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-P2 was unveiled 3 years before the FZ200 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-P2 grades versus the FZ200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-P2 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-P2
FZ200 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2012 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 27 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic FZ200
E-P2 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 against the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f4b5/8f4b5459dfa89450c5b044552dd1f474062e03a4" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P2 and FZ200 is 86 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/759f7/759f7a0e495e4093a918202370f27616bd511d54" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P2 and FZ200.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-P2 provides the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d1df/0d1df95e420ca851f014a81551c3ae7484cd3c3d" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e52f/2e52fc059171bba350faac83440832bff7637b80" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic V | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355g (0.78 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 540 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $499 |