Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 front
Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-P3
Panasonic GF1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
  • Introduced October 2009
  • Successor is Panasonic GF2
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P2 (12MP) and the GF1 (12MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras posses the same sensor size (Four Thirds).

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-P2 was manufactured 7 months after the GF1 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-P2 matches up vs the GF1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Panasonic GF1

 E-P2 GF1 
IntroducedApril 2010October 2009More modern by 7 months

Reasons to pick Panasonic GF1 over the Olympus E-P2

 GF1 E-P2 
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic GF1

 E-P2 GF1 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display size
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has got exterior dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF1 has sizing of 119mm x 71mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") accompanied by a weight of 385 grams (0.85 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-P2 vs the GF1.

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and GF1 is 86 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and GF1.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same resolution and you can expect similar quality of files however you will want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The fresher E-P2 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography information
Panasonic GF1 Portrait photography information
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Street photography features
Panasonic GF1 Street photography features
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no moving screen
64
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography highlights
Panasonic GF1 Sports photography highlights
40
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
44
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
good battery (380 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Panasonic GF1
43
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery life (300 shots)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
59
good battery (380 CIPA)
built-in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse function
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography information
Panasonic GF1 Landscape photography information
60
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (300 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse recording
60
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
good battery (380 shots)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging highlights
Panasonic GF1 Vlogging highlights
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detect focusing
does not have a selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
25
includes face detect focus
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-P2 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Panasonic GF1
 Olympus PEN E-P2Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-04-22 2009-10-14
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic V Venus Engine HD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 23
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD Lite
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 grams (0.78 pounds) 385 grams (0.85 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 56 54
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 21.2
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 10.3
DXO Low light rating 505 513
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 380 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images))
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/MMC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $799 $400