Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900

Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
42
Overall
44
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
65
Features
62
Overall
63

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Introduced April 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P1
  • Successor is Olympus E-P3
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Announced October 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A99
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus E-P2 and Sony A900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and A900 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-P2 was introduced 19 months after the A900 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-P2 matches up versus the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony A900

 E-P2 A900 
AnnouncedApril 2010October 2008More modern by 19 months

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus E-P2

 A900 E-P2 
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony A900

 E-P2 A900 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Neither features Touch screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-P2 enjoys outer measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

See the Olympus E-P2 and Sony A900 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-P2 compared to the A900.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and A900 is 86 and 54 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P2 and A900.

Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A900 will give you extra detail using its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher E-P2 will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A900 as a Portrait photography camera
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
71
has manual focus
great megapixels (25MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no liveview feature
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Sony A900 as a Street photography camera
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A900 as a Sports photography camera
39
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery power (300 shots)
lack of phase detect auto focus
70
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
great megapixels (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
environment sealing
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Sony A900
43
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery power (300 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
54
environment sealing
great megapixels (25 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography factors
Sony A900 Landscape photography factors
60
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery power (300 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
72
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
great megapixels (25 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
no liveview feature
does not have Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A900 as a Vlogging camera
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing microphone port
9
no video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony A900
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced DSLR
Introduced 2010-04-22 2008-10-22
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 25 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 6048 x 4032
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lb) 895 gr (1.97 lb)
Dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 79
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 12.3
DXO Low light score 505 1431
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 880 photographs
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots One Two
Launch price $799 $2,736