Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Released August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 14 months earlier than the Q-S1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-PM2 grades versus the Q-S1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Pentax Q-S1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Pentax Q-S1
E-PM2 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-PM2
Q-S1 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | May 2013 | Newer by 14 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Pentax Q-S1
E-PM2 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PM2 provides exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Pentax Q-S1 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Pentax Q-S1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PM2 versus the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f00b/0f00be3fd25e8f685476b3ec88e6b5513019fec6" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and Q-S1 is 89 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d00b/5d00be1a53a62d1ad2cdbac7a3cd7fd7ab2c1e10" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and Q-S1.
Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd097/fd097db7fabe6a2a1ee129f7f60d411893d216c1" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbb53/fbb53c7a1ccc4f962fd1c8aa8766bfd2601450a6" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Total lenses | 107 | 8 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 250 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $448 | $250 |