Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Announced May 2012
  • Old Model is Sony HX100V
  • Renewed by Sony HX300
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Overview

On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX200V, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and HX200V (18MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-P2 was unveiled 3 years prior to the HX200V which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-P2 matches up vs the HX200V when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Sony HX200V

 E-P2 HX200V 

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-P2

 HX200V E-P2 
AnnouncedMay 2012April 2010More modern by 25 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution922k230kSharper screen (+692k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX200V

 E-P2 HX200V 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P2 has outside dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has proportions of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") with a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 and the HX200V.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and HX200V is 86 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The image here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P2 and HX200V.

All in all, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Sony HX200V will resolve extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Portrait photography camera
60
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
45
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (18 megapixels)
has face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-P2
Street photography with Sony HX200V
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
51
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than others in class (583 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography features
Sony HX200V Sports photography features
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
low battery (300 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
56
amazing zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
has tracking autofocus
good battery life (450 shots)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX200V as a Travel photography camera
43
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery (300 shots)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
57
good battery life (450 per charge)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (27mm)
great zoom (810mm)
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others in class (583 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography features
Sony HX200V Landscape photography features
60
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
low battery (300 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
50
focusing manually
pretty wide (27mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (18MP)
good battery life (450 shots)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging details
Sony HX200V Vlogging details
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic support
27
pretty wide (27mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (583g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-P2 vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Sony HX200V
 Olympus PEN E-P2Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-04-22 2012-05-11
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic V BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 922 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 gr (0.78 lbs) 583 gr (1.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos 450 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $799 $480