Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus 6010, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the 6010 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and 6010 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-P3 was brought out 2 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-P3 scores against the 6010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus 6010
E-P3 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Olympus E-P3
6010 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus 6010
E-P3 | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P3 offers outside measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6010 has dimensions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus 6010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P3 compared to the 6010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a632/1a6324da21e9d92681bc41757f205a9fafc66797" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and 6010 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a900a/a900a9be2b52e78c5d076b6c619e71a9dc1fea5c" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P3 and 6010.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The E-P3 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The more modern E-P3 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f344/6f344c2ab30502068c871b32aff9d2ee77ee414a" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f99ed/f99ed15ff7c0abd3b9673aeb2942c3b57dba7109" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 6010 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-08-17 | 2009-07-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50C |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $0 |