Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Successor is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the TG-1 iHS (12MP) is very similar but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-P3 was unveiled 8 months before the TG-1 iHS and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-P3 matches up vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-P3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 610k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
TG-1 iHS | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | ![]() | August 2011 | More recent by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-P3 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P3 provides external measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-P3 and the TG-1 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f3c/30f3c22f9a9b28d25e6909e07fe336f3c8780552" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-P3 and TG-1 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/824f7/824f702801d3374ec905424f687faafda22dcd97" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P3 and TG-1 iHS.
As you can tell, both the cameras offer the same exact resolution but different sensor measurements. The E-P3 offers the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier. The older E-P3 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1f19/d1f1998fb393ef85aa48e42e8081a53cf113280c" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd8b5/cd8b5d93184ca8df73156233a0f223782f1e03bd" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $399 |