Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-P3 was released 22 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-P3 scores against the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 610k | Sharper screen (+4k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
| TG-2 iHS | E-P3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P3 compared to the TG-2 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-P3 provides the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-P3 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 369 grams (0.81 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $380 |