Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-P3 was released 22 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-P3 scores against the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 610k | Sharper screen (+4k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
TG-2 iHS | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P3 compared to the TG-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-P3 provides the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-P3 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $380 |