Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P3 was released 22 months earlier than the TG-2 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the E-P3 scores against the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 614k | 610k | Sharper screen (+4k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-P3
| TG-2 iHS | E-P3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 | August 2011 | More modern by 22 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-P3 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P3 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has sizing of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P3 compared to the TG-2 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-P3 and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizes. The E-P3 provides the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-P3 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 614 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 369 grams (0.81 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $380 |