Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P2
- Renewed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-P3 was launched 4 months before the VG-160 so they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-P3 matches up vs the VG-160 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 and Olympus VG-160. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-P3 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Olympus VG-160
E-P3 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+384k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-P3
VG-160 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Olympus VG-160
E-P3 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2012 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P3 provides physical dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-P3 compared to the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/209a2/209a2251abb4a3827d2ada3aa7a058ffa4473ce3" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and VG-160 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27678/27678a1aea9adddb7952466ebcfe2e50baa683b7" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and VG-160.
Clearly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-P3 due to its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VG-160 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48eb1/48eb1436120579887fd516d75acad18b6d90dc48" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c91/14c91e9e550cad7f727cdbee76c754bc6c7b7c79" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Olympus VG-160 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-08-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 369g (0.81 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 165 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $90 |