Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P2
- Refreshed by Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-P3 versus Panasonic FX78, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the FX78 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-P3 was brought out 7 months later than the FX78 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-P3 scores versus the FX78 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Panasonic FX78
E-P3 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2011 | January 2011 | Fresher by 7 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-P3
FX78 | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic FX78
E-P3 | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-P3 enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Panasonic FX78 has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P3 versus Panasonic FX78 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P3 against the FX78.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-P3 and FX78 is 86 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The photograph here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and FX78.
All in all, each of these cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-P3 contains the bigger sensor which will make getting shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-P3 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2011-01-25 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 200 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $210 |