Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea0/b6ea0a3b948d31de853e5f9d71a6d0a49f1b5795" alt="Olympus PEN E-P3 front Olympus PEN E-P3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3a83/a3a8345ec89b1fa7b1b27cd7338ab82f26546b0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Launched August 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-ZX1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-P3 (12MP) and the ZR1 (12MP) is fairly close but the E-P3 (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P3 was brought out 2 years later than the ZR1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-P3 scores against the ZR1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P3 Gallery & Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Panasonic ZR1
E-P3 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-P3
ZR1 | E-P3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic ZR1
E-P3 | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P3 has outside dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs) while the Panasonic ZR1 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the E-P3 against the ZR1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d99e/0d99eadcfea7cf4e627ed315e267076774d5eec2" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P3 and ZR1 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ade3c/ade3c8b6ce67817be34f559550c7c7972ab5252e" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P3 and ZR1.
As you can see, both the cameras provide the same resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-P3 comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field simpler. The newer E-P3 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5f0b/c5f0b452d924e833fc2b5abacc8bd7394718c227" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76781/76781038270554b6b5004662d767e25778f38e56" alt="Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P3 vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-08-17 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 614k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 gr (0.81 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $280 |