Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-P5 was introduced 15 months after the FZ200 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-P5 matches up against the FZ200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-P5 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2013 | July 2012 | More modern by 15 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-P5
| FZ200 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200
| E-P5 | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P5 provides outside measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-P5 compared to the FZ200.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and FZ200 is 85 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P5 and FZ200.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-P5 will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer E-P5 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2012-07-18 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/320 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) | 588 gr (1.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 895 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | 540 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $389 | $499 |