Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200
85 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- New Model is Panasonic FZ300
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-P5 was introduced 15 months after the FZ200 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-P5 matches up against the FZ200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-P5 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | July 2012 | More modern by 15 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-P5
FZ200 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200
E-P5 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P5 provides outside measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has sizing of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-P5 compared to the FZ200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and FZ200 is 85 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P5 and FZ200.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-P5 will give extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The newer E-P5 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2012-07-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) | 588 gr (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 540 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $389 | $499 |