Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300
85 Imaging
53 Features
76 Overall
62
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Revealed July 2015
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ200
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-P5 versus Panasonic FZ300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-P5 was launched 21 months before the FZ300 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-P5 scores against the FZ300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-P5 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-P5
FZ300 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2015 | October 2013 | More modern by 21 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Clearer display (+3k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic FZ300
E-P5 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P5 has got outer dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ300 has dimensions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P5 versus Panasonic FZ300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-P5 compared to the FZ300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and FZ300 is 85 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The pic underneath should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P5 and FZ300.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-P5 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P5 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-10-03 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420 grams (0.93 pounds) | 691 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 380 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $389 | $598 |