Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P5 and Sigma Quattro, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-P5 was manufactured 3 years before the Quattro which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-P5 matches up vs the Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Sigma Quattro
E-P5 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-P5
Quattro | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 29 months |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+583k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Sigma Quattro
E-P5 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P5 features external dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-P5 and Sigma Quattro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P5 compared to the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29247/2924793f515ed350c1dcc5df1bbdabc5f816dfd4" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P5 and Quattro is 85 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bdc/78bdc4cfe87c5112982a2c3921a649c86e4d1567" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P5 and Quattro.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve extra detail due to its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-P5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e6fe/0e6fe610010540cf24d5484583c7836870eec99d" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb91c/eb91c0cb156e97ad090c7b5f2d2db979ba9f47ff" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-10-03 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 107 | 76 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420g (0.93 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $389 | $738 |