Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc101/dc10188719485a09ad742701947499d616aae498" alt="Sony Alpha a6300 front Sony Alpha a6300 front"
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Announced February 2016
- Replaced the Sony A6000
- Newer Model is Sony A6500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-P5 versus Sony A6300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and A6300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-P5 was launched 3 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-P5 grades vs the A6300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P5 and Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-P5 Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Sony A6300
E-P5 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Olympus E-P5
A6300 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 28 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Sony A6300
E-P5 | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-P5 enjoys outer measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) and the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-P5 versus Sony A6300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P5 versus the A6300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68ec0/68ec0f9d41fdc706b5924a0fcc44797586083959" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and A6300 is 85 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec54b/ec54b22c825136a32f3a98db8dadb83727d753f9" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The pic here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-P5 and A6300.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P5 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A6300 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P5 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b96c9/b96c9b8adbec83f59ed7a960cfbb385dbb005278" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2e64/d2e64f1b597d20579c5ff3e5c748800f6564d911" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-10-03 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420 grams (0.93 lb) | 404 grams (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | 895 | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $389 | $889 |