Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
![Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-PEN-E-P5/Olympus-E-P5-front.jpg)
![Sony SLT-A57 front Sony SLT-A57 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-SLT-A57/Sony-A57-front.jpg)
64 Imaging
57 Features
85 Overall
68
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-P5 versus Sony A57, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-P5 (16MP) and the A57 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and A57 (APS-C) provide different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The E-P5 was brought out 13 months later than the A57 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A57 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-P5 matches up against the A57 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Sony SLT-A57. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Sony A57 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Sony A57
E-P5 | A57 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | ![]() | September 2012 | More recent by 13 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A57 over the Olympus E-P5
A57 | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Sony A57
E-P5 | A57 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-P5 has physical dimensions of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Sony A57 has specifications of 132mm x 98mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") and a weight of 618 grams (1.36 lbs).
See the Olympus E-P5 versus Sony A57 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-P5 against the A57.
![Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-P5-vs-Sony-SLT-A57-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and A57 is 85 and 64 respectively.
![Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-P5-vs-Sony-SLT-A57-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-P5 and A57.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The E-P5 features the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF trickier. The more modern E-P5 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
![Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-P5-vs-Sony-SLT-A57-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-P5-vs-Sony-SLT-A57-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A57 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony SLT-A57 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony SLT-A57 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2013-10-03 | 2012-09-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | Xtra Fine TFT drive with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420g (0.93 lbs) | 618g (1.36 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 132 x 98 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | 895 | 785 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 550 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $389 | $1,000 |