Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-310, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1 was revealed 7 months earlier than the TG-310 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PL1 scores vs the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-310
E-PL1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-PL1
TG-310 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-310
E-PL1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 provides physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL1 compared to the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5beb/f5beb673fafd1709fba887f5d24358d4c82edb2e" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and TG-310 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9fcf/c9fcf7f7f334f1eeb2c74bca2785bfd2f04db17f" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specs. The image underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1 and TG-310.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-310 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d256f/d256ff842fe36e2dd4656ee4743d9d5fe640fa56" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68dc0/68dc04b61fd0db6d58cbe5ab48bf263348dcbb7e" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus TG-310 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-05-17 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lb) | 155 gr (0.34 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 150 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $288 | $0 |