Clicky

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced May 2010
  • New Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-PL1 was manufactured 8 months prior to the VR-330 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PL1 matches up vs the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-PL1 VR-330 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL1

 VR-330 E-PL1 
RevealedFebruary 2011May 2010More recent by 8 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VR-330

 E-PL1 VR-330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1 has got physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL1 against the VR-330.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and VR-330 is 86 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading technical specs. The photograph below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and VR-330.

As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus VR-330 will offer you greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots more aggressively. The older E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL1
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
60
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
33
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Street photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Street photography advice
74
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography factors
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
no phase detect AF
47
amazing zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography highlights
51
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
70
lighter than competition (158g)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Landscape photography info
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography info
55
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging factors
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (158 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus PEN E-PL1Olympus VR-330
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus VR-330
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2010-05-17 2011-02-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Truepic V TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 334g (0.74 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 487 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch price $288 $220