Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b169f/b169f2b717cb8d5ef4499816cf19dad2fd0b1dbd" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 front"
94 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Following is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic FH25, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and FH25 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL1 was launched 7 months prior to the FH25 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-PL1 grades vs the FH25 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Panasonic FH25
E-PL1 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus E-PL1
FH25 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 7 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic FH25
E-PL1 | FH25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 comes with outside measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Panasonic FH25 has measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic FH25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1 vs the FH25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0025c/0025cb1840b15f412e7556cfc6270e86f9ab90d7" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and FH25 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b29/33b29e76fada06e1d1d1340f18d7a8001697a8f6" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes only by looking at specifications. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and FH25.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FH25 will give greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1866/f1866033310dc8ba0ffdc6e4118f7c851dce4fe1" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12564/12564e5475a2e10483ec7c373e3f7ff083159a66" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-05-17 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 lbs) | 159g (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 250 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $288 | $180 |