Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Updated by Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched December 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the K-x (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and K-x (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL1 was released 5 months later than the K-x so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-PL1 grades versus the K-x in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Pentax K-x. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Pentax K-x
| E-PL1 | K-x |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus E-PL1
| K-x | E-PL1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K-x
| E-PL1 | K-x | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2010 |  | December 2009 | Same generation |
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1 features external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Pentax K-x has dimensions of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL1 vs the K-x.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and K-x is 86 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and K-x.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact megapixels but not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL1 provides the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K-x Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K-x | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K-x |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2010-05-17 | 2009-12-23 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Truepic V | Prime |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Available lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 16.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 334g (0.74 lb) | 580g (1.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 487 | 811 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | 1900 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $288 | $600 |