Clicky

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
86
Imaging
46
Features
43
Overall
44
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
56
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed May 2010
  • Updated by Olympus E-PL1s
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Introduced April 2013
  • Later Model is Ricoh GR II
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and GR (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PL1 was revealed 3 years before the GR and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL1 matches up versus the GR with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Ricoh GR

 E-PL1 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus E-PL1

 GR E-PL1 
IntroducedApril 2013May 2010More recent by 35 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh GR

 E-PL1 GR 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1 offers physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has specifications of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL1 against the GR.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and GR is 86 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The visual underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1 and GR.

All in all, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Ricoh GR will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Portrait photography highlights
59
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
saves RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
73
you can focus manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL1
Street photography with Ricoh GR
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (245 grams)
good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography features
Ricoh GR Sports photography features
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
low battery (290 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
44
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography info
Ricoh GR Travel photography info
51
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low battery (290 shots)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL1
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR
54
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
low battery (290 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse recording
61
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL1
Vlogging with Ricoh GR
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focusing
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic socket
30
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (245g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus PEN E-PL1Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PL1 Ricoh GR
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-05-17 2013-04-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 300 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 334 grams (0.74 pounds) 245 grams (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 54 78
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 13.5
DXO Low light score 487 972
Other
Battery life 290 photos 290 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $288 $971