Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-PL1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL1 was unveiled 2 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL1 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL1 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL1
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
E-PL1 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2010 | March 2010 | Same generation | |
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1 has got outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 86 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PL1 will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-05-17 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 410 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $288 | $349 |