Clicky

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed May 2010
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-PL1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-PL1 was unveiled 2 months after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL1 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-PL1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus E-PL1

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC E-PL1 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 E-PL1 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
RevealedMay 2010March 2010Same generation
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1 has got outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PL1 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 86 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The picture below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

To sum up, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-PL1 will provide extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
36
manual focus
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low MP (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (290 per charge)
does not have phase detect autofocus
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
low fps (2.0 fps)
low MP (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography advice
51
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (290 CIPA)
resolution not great (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
60
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
low MP (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
55
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery power (290 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse function
47
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
low MP (10MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
28
reasonably wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus PEN E-PL1Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL1 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-05-17 2010-03-18
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Truepic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 334g (0.74 lbs) 355g (0.78 lbs)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 487 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures 410 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $288 $349