Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
- Successor is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-PL1s and Samsung HZ25W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the HZ25W (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and HZ25W (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL1s was released 5 months later than the HZ25W so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-PL1s scores vs the HZ25W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Samsung HZ25W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Samsung HZ25W
| E-PL1s | HZ25W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Olympus E-PL1s
| HZ25W | E-PL1s | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Samsung HZ25W
| E-PL1s | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2010 | July 2010 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1s features outside dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL1s and Samsung HZ25W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1s against the HZ25W.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and HZ25W is 86 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and HZ25W.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-PL1s features the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-PL1s vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Samsung HZ25W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) | 428 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $599 | $350 |