Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SH-50, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are created by Olympus. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-PL2 was unveiled 23 months before the SH-50 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL2 matches up versus the SH-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SH-50

 E-PL2 SH-50 

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-PL2

 SH-50 E-PL2 
ReleasedJanuary 2013February 2011More recent by 23 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SH-50

 E-PL2 SH-50 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Display resolution460k460kIdentical display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 has external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has sizing of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SH-50 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PL2 compared to the SH-50.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and SH-50 is 85 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and SH-50.

As you can see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus SH-50 will resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography features
Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography features
60
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
44
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
offers face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography information
Olympus SH-50 Street photography information
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
boasts touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (269g)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography highlights
Olympus SH-50 Sports photography highlights
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
bad battery (280 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
48
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-PL2
Travel photography with Olympus SH-50
51
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery (280 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
boasts touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.0)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography info
Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography info
61
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
bad battery (280 per charge)
does not have Timelapse mode
49
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging details
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging details
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection autofocus
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone support
34
decently wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (269g)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SH-50
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Olympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Olympus SH-50
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-02-11 2013-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Truepic V TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 15s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m 4.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 grams (0.80 lb) 269 grams (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at release $0 $300