Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL2 was revealed 23 months earlier than the TG-830 iHS which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-PL2 grades vs the TG-830 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PL2 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-PL2
TG-830 iHS | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-PL2 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 features physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 versus the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and TG-830 iHS is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through technical specs. The pic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will give extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-02-11 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 lb) | 214 gr (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 300 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $0 |