Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus VH-410, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL2 was revealed 18 months prior to the VH-410 making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL2 matches up against the VH-410 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus VH-410
E-PL2 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-PL2
VH-410 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VH-410
E-PL2 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 features outside measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus VH-410 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL2 versus the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37a5d/37a5dcd5d4a9b9ee0e569b6f747f3ee13a795221" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and VH-410 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/700b8/700b833dd1a7870dc82e44dc8255cb77ebbc0946" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The picture here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and VH-410.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus VH-410 will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99736/99736c3676eee11d8bea12f13f0e71e982862b64" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cb58/8cb58ba3e4946f43b63d29377da0452ab3a3bf50" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VH-410 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $186 |