Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Updated by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very similar but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL2 was brought out very close to the VR-330 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the VR-330 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus VR-330. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus VR-330
E-PL2 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL2
VR-330 | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VR-330
E-PL2 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2011 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL2 offers outside dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL2 versus the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe984/fe984b599d44b155b8ad8dc5e27c8e8f1b44d380" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and VR-330 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2cc9/c2cc910e518f8f3dce324d88404e2f3c9e325121" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and VR-330.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-330 will offer extra detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c9ad/0c9ad8438970f7a8efe627cadf6819996f7de050" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cab78/cab78d78bcef359a8f58767d224631c8cf572697" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 158 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $220 |