Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
45
Overall
52

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL3
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PL2 was unveiled 11 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-PL2 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-PL2 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL2

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 E-PL2 
ReleasedFebruary 2012February 2011Fresher by 11 months
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 E-PL2 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL2 has outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL2 compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography information
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
74
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography features
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography features
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography details
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (280 per charge)
no phase detect autofocus
48
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Travel photography info
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (280 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
59
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL2
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
61
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery (280 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
63
focusing manually
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging details
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
offers face detect focus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic jack
heavier than competition in class (550 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2011-02-11 2012-02-02
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-85mm (3.5x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 180 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362g (0.80 lb) 550g (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 pictures 400 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $0 $871