Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- Successor is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PL2 was unveiled 11 months before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-PL2 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL2 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-PL2
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | February 2011 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
E-PL2 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL2 has outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL2 compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | 400 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $0 | $871 |