Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Successor is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Launched August 2010
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is pretty close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL2 was released 7 months after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PL2 grades vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PL2 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | August 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-PL2
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PL2 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 85 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The image here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PL2 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-PL2 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 367 grams (0.81 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 440 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $147 |