Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Updated by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX210
- Updated by Samsung NX500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL2 was released 3 years prior to the NX300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL2 scores vs the NX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Samsung NX300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Samsung NX300
| E-PL2 | NX300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-PL2
| NX300 | E-PL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2013 | February 2011 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 768k | 460k | Clearer screen (+308k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Samsung NX300
| E-PL2 | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has sizing of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 against the NX300.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and NX300 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The image here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and NX300.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300 will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PL2 vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Samsung NX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Samsung NX300 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2011-02-11 | 2013-11-24 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Truepic V | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 362g (0.80 lbs) | 331g (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | 76 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | 12.7 |
| DXO Low light score | 573 | 942 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photos | 330 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $750 |