Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III

Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Sony Alpha A7R III front
Portability
63
Imaging
77
Features
93
Overall
83

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Later Model is Olympus E-PL3
Sony A7R III
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Boost to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 657g - 127 x 96 x 74mm
  • Launched October 2017
  • Earlier Model is Sony A7R II
  • Newer Model is Sony A7R IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Sony A7R III, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and A7R III (42MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and A7R III (Full frame) offer different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-PL2 was released 7 years earlier than the A7R III and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7R III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL2 scores vs the A7R III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Sony A7R III

 E-PL2 A7R III 

Reasons to pick Sony A7R III over the Olympus E-PL2

 A7R III E-PL2 
LaunchedOctober 2017February 2011More recent by 81 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1440k460kClearer screen (+980k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Sony A7R III

 E-PL2 A7R III 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 features external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Sony A7R III has measurements of 127mm x 96mm x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 657 grams (1.45 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Sony A7R III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL2 vs the A7R III.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and A7R III is 85 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and A7R III.

To sum up, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony A7R III will provide greater detail as a result of its extra 30MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A7R III as a Portrait photography camera
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
86
focusing manually
sensor resolution is excellent (42MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography details
Sony A7R III Street photography details
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
79
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
weather proofing
above average high ISO (32,000)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL2
Sports photography with Sony A7R III
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (280 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
88
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is excellent (42MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proofing
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography details
Sony A7R III Travel photography details
51
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (280 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
73
better than average battery power (650 shots)
weather proofing
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
sensor resolution is excellent (42 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A7R III as a Landscape photography camera
60
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery life (280 CIPA)
no Timelapse recording
87
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is excellent (42 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
doesnt have anti aliasing filter
above average high ISO (32,000)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
better than average battery power (650 per charge)
two card slots
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A7R III as a Vlogging camera
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone jack
36
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes external mic socket
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A7R III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Sony A7R III
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Sony Alpha A7R III
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Sony Alpha A7R III
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2011-02-11 2017-10-25
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Truepic V Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 42MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 6400 32000
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 425
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 107 121
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 1,440k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 3,686k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/8000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362g (0.80 lb) 657g (1.45 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 127 x 96 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 100
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 26.0
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 14.7
DXO Low light rating 573 3523
Other
Battery life 280 pictures 650 pictures
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC Two SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support on one)
Card slots 1 2
Launch pricing $0 $2,800