Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300

Portability
85
Imaging
47
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
  • Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced January 2008
  • Replacement is Sony A330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Overview

Below is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the A300 (10MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-PL2 was revealed 3 years later than the A300 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-PL2 scores versus the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Sony A300

 E-PL2 A300 
IntroducedFebruary 2011January 2008More recent by 37 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-PL2

 A300 E-PL2 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Sony A300

 E-PL2 A300 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys exterior measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL2 against the A300.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and A300 is 85 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL2 and A300.

All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL2 will give more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-PL2 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A300 as a Portrait photography camera
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
59
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
low resolution (10MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Street photography camera
Sony A300 as a Street photography camera
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen does not articulate
74
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A300 as a Sports photography camera
44
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
low battery pack (280 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography factors
Sony A300 Travel photography factors
51
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery pack (280 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography details
Sony A300 Landscape photography details
60
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
low battery pack (280 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
57
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging advice
Sony A300 Vlogging advice
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection autofocus
does not contain selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
9
no video
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL2 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Sony A300
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2011-02-11 2008-01-30
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3872 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Number of lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 10.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 gr (0.80 lb) 632 gr (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 64
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 11.4
DXO Low light score 573 538
Other
Battery life 280 pictures -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC Compact Flash
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $0 $0