Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9387/c9387039ab5c223fcc36ca8de7fbd3b8f5516027" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is very similar but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL3 was manufactured 2 years after the 6000 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-PL3 grades versus the 6000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus 6000
E-PL3 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 28 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-PL3
6000 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus 6000
E-PL3 | 6000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the 6000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcaad/fcaadc78ee05db99633b9228a880fd3e7c84aa75" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and 6000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76ac1/76ac19a3b0b62fb2e5081109048440fa2fb9c4fa" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and 6000.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL3 will deliver more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The newer E-PL3 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/155aa/155aa5f67ff28e5ca8c67f8ad34168facd0f3510" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f304/4f30488bb2de407307e0df210f722205d7c2fb64" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 6000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-09-20 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 50 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) | 179 gr (0.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $259 |