Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-870, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL3 was manufactured 5 years before the TG-870 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-PL3 scores versus the TG-870 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus TG-870
E-PL3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-PL3
TG-870 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | September 2011 | Newer by 52 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-870
E-PL3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL3 has got outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has proportions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus TG-870 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PL3 against the TG-870.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and TG-870 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and TG-870.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL3 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PL3 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-20 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic VI | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 lbs) | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $399 | $280 |