Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Announced September 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-PL3 versus Olympus VG-145, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL3 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL3 was manufactured 2 months after the VG-145 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-PL3 scores versus the VG-145 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus VG-145. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus VG-145
E-PL3 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-PL3
VG-145 | E-PL3 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus VG-145
E-PL3 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Same age |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL3 features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL3 versus Olympus VG-145 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL3 against the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64b65/64b65c928811e3b0a6b4b4bc791a752afb950677" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and VG-145 is 88 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d568d/d568dea0dbc1bd0e68567bdfe324a39511d47c17" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL3 and VG-145.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL3 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VG-145 will result in extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47834/47834fd49924ca0c0180f4c24cdc7d0a73d3e710" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/834a1/834a191d3429165a39a3c1ce5ce02c5114bc99f1" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2011-09-20 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic VI | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 gr (0.69 lb) | 120 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 160 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $0 |