Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35
88 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL3 was released 3 years before the ZS35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-PL3 grades against the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic ZS35
| E-PL3 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PL3
| ZS35 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | September 2011 | Fresher by 27 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic ZS35
| E-PL3 | ZS35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the ZS35.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and ZS35 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and ZS35.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
| Other name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-09-20 | 2014-01-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Truepic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 21 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $300 |