Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Released January 2014
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS30
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Here, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic ZS35, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL3 was released 3 years before the ZS35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-PL3 grades against the ZS35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-PL3 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PL3
ZS35 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | September 2011 | Fresher by 27 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Panasonic ZS35
E-PL3 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 enjoys external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has specifications of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL3 versus Panasonic ZS35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL3 compared to the ZS35.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL3 and ZS35 is 88 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and ZS35.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic ZS35 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL3 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-09-20 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313g (0.69 lb) | 305g (0.67 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $399 | $300 |