Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D
88 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Introduced May 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax K110D, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and K110D (6MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and K110D (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL3 was released 5 years later than the K110D and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-PL3 matches up vs the K110D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Pentax K110D. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Pentax K110D
| E-PL3 | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 | May 2006 | Fresher by 65 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 210k | Sharper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus E-PL3
| K110D | E-PL3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax K110D
| E-PL3 | K110D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL3 offers outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Pentax K110D has measurements of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL3 and Pentax K110D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL3 against the K110D.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL3 and K110D is 88 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL3 and K110D.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus E-PL3 will provide extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PL3 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-PL3 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax K110D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Pentax K110D |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2011-09-20 | 2006-05-22 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/160s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 313 grams (0.69 lb) | 585 grams (1.29 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 52 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $399 | $1,000 |