Clicky

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Announced January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Here is a extended overview of the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung WB50F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and WB50F (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-PL3 was announced 3 years prior to the WB50F and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PL3 grades vs the WB50F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Samsung WB50F

 E-PL3 WB50F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus E-PL3

 WB50F E-PL3 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014September 2011Fresher by 28 months

Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung WB50F

 E-PL3 WB50F 
Focus manually Dial exact focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither has Touch friendly display

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 has outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL3 and the WB50F.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and WB50F is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL3 and WB50F.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL3 with its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB50F will offer you greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PL3 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Portrait photography camera
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW files
low MP (12MP)
37
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Street photography information
Samsung WB50F Street photography information
84
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (207g)
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Sports photography camera
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (300 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Travel photography camera
44
missing Timelapse recording
not so great battery pack (300 per charge)
low MP (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competitors (207 grams)
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (24mm)
very long reach (288mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Landscape photography highlights
61
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (300 CIPA)
missing Timelapse recording
47
has manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging details
Samsung WB50F Vlogging details
34
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
missing external microphone support
30
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (207 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL3 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL3 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus PEN E-PL3Samsung WB50F
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL3 Samsung WB50F
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2011-09-20 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 12800 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 35 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-288mm (12.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s -
Continuous shutter speed 6.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format AVCHD, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 313 grams (0.69 pounds) 207 grams (0.46 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 52 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.9 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 499 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-5 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $399 $180