Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL5 was released 2 years after the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL5 grades versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL5 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | September 2010 | Newer by 25 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-PL5
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL5 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL5 has got exterior dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL5 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL5 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL5 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL5 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus E-PL5 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PL5 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 320 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $400 | $566 |