Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-PL5 and Sigma Quattro, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL5 was announced 4 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-PL5 grades versus the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL5 and Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Sigma Quattro
E-PL5 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PL5
Quattro | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | September 2012 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 460k | Clearer screen (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Sigma Quattro
E-PL5 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL5 offers external measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL5 and Sigma Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL5 versus the Quattro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL5 and Quattro is 88 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL5 and Quattro.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will resolve greater detail with its extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 107 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $738 |