Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and CX5 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL6 was revealed 3 years later than the CX5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL6 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX5 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL6 grades versus the CX5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL6 and Ricoh CX5. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery and Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Ricoh CX5
| E-PL6 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2014 | July 2011 | More recent by 37 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus E-PL6
| CX5 | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh CX5
| E-PL6 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL6 features physical measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL6 against the CX5.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and CX5 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL6 and CX5.
Clearly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL6 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL6 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher E-PL6 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2014-08-01 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $399 |