Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
88 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-PL7
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the E-PL6 (16MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the E-PL6 (Four Thirds) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL6 was manufactured 4 years later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL6 matches up versus the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL6 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PL6 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2014 | August 2010 | More recent by 49 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Olympus E-PL6
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | E-PL6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
E-PL6 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL6 offers physical dimensions of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL6 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL6 and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL6 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 88 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at technical specs. The visual here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL6 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL6 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL6 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-PL6 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL6 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-08-01 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lbs) | 367 gr (0.81 lbs) |
Dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 440 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $300 | $147 |